Interregionalism is not a technical concept. It is a political proposition. It asks what becomes possible when regions with different histories, capacities, languages and knowledge traditions build cooperation together, not around each other. The Interregional Dialogue Process gives institutional form to this proposition.
Promoted and sustained by Obreal with governments, universities, regional organisations, funding agencies and multilateral partners, it has consolidated a polycentric architecture across different Souths and Norths. Its purpose is not to add another forum to the international calendar. It is to create a sustained space where regions define agendas, produce knowledge, build institutional cooperation and develop long-term capacities together.
The Process begins from a clear political premise. There is no single South and no single North. There are multiple Souths and multiple Norths, each with distinct histories, responsibilities, priorities and capacities. Serious cooperation must be able to work with that plurality. This is why the Process is multilingual by nature and polycentric by design. It treats diversity not as a difficulty to be managed, but as the condition for more legitimate and effective cooperation.
Multilingualism is not a logistical accommodation. It is a political declaration. Women’s participation is not a programme. It is a condition of legitimacy. Polycentric governance is not a preference. It is the architecture through which different Souths and Norths can co-produce what no single centre can produce alone.
Interregionalism does not replace multilateralism. It strengthens the political and institutional conditions through which multilateral cooperation can become more grounded, more inclusive and more operational. Where multilateralism provides the grammar of common rules and shared principles, interregionalism creates the political practice through which those principles connect with regional capacities, institutional realities and shared responsibility.
TWO STRATEGIC AXES
The Process operates through two strategic axes where development, governance and knowledge converge. All Souths and all Norths face versions of the same structural challenges: climate transition, digital transformation, governance reform, educational inclusion and the restructuring of global trade. The Process does not transfer solutions from one region to another. It creates the conditions for regions to co-construct responses, share what works and build common capacities for challenges no single region can address alone. Not transfer. Not aid. Working with others.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
01
Reimagining cooperation
Political and institutional innovation is essential to generate transformative impact and turn dialogue into concrete pathways for action.
02
Multilingualism
as a policy
Cooperation begins by listening in the language of others. It is not just translation; it is recognition, reciprocity, and the plural circulation of knowledge.
03
Universities as strategic actors
Universities generate public value and act as bridges between knowledge, public policy, and territories.
04
Polycentric architecture
Multiple poles from which to shape thinking on development and cooperation, without a single predefined agenda.
05
Women at the centre
There is no just development without women’s full participation, leadership, and enabling conditions in education, science, and innovation.
06
Renewed multilateralism
Strengthening and updating multilateralism through interregional cooperation by linking it with regional capacities and implementation agendas.
HOW THE PROCESS WAS BUILT
The Interregional Dialogue Process was built through political encounters, institutional commitments and sustained partnerships. Its foundations were laid through Obreal’s consultations in 2020 and 2021 with governments and university associations from Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia and Europe. It took institutional shape in Barcelona in 2022 and developed through successive stages in Buenos Aires, Windhoek, Addis Ababa and Bogotá, each one deepening its political, academic and institutional architecture.























